The use of very low calorie diets to lose weight has a checkered history, which includes a long list of adverse health effects
that range from losing one's hair to death from unbeatable heart irregularities. In addition, the effect of very low calorie
diets on the body has not been completely defined. Some studies have been done on people who were not obese to start with, and
many studies have been of short duration. This last point was one of the mistakes of the "Dr. Atkin's Diet Revolution," which
claimed increased calorie loss if you were on a carbohydrate-restricted diet. The apparent benefits from a low-calorie,
high-protein diet did not persist with diets of longer duration. It was proved that over the long term, the number of calories
in the diet was what counted, not whether the calories were from protein or carbohydrate.
One of the continuing concerns about very low calorie diets has been the loss of body protein. That is un-desirable because it
decreases active metabolic tissue, such as muscle, and that decreases the number of calories your body uses, even at rest. The
end result of that situation is that you need fewer calories to maintain your body after a diet than you needed before you
started the diet, which means you have to eat even less to avoid obesity. Worse still, protein can be lost from vital organs,
such as the heart muscle.
To clarify what such a very low calorie diet really does in obese middle-aged women, investigators at Ohio State University,
Columbus, studied 15 such women for 4-6 months (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 45: 1987, 381). They were on a diet of
only 420 calories a day and 280 calories (70 grams) were from protein. The women stayed on the diet from 12.9 to 22.4 weeks
(average 18.1 weeks). They each lost from 0.8 kg (1.76 pounds) to 1.6 kg (3-52 pounds) of bodyweight a week, an average of 1.1
kg (2.42 pounds) a week.
These were rather heavy women with an average of 46.8% of their bodyweight as fat before they started the diet. After the diet,
the average percent of bodyweight as fat was 35.5%.
Body composition studies were surprising in that 83% of the bodyweight lost was fat and only 17% was from body protein. Previous
studies have shown that as much as a third of the weight loss on such very low calorie diets is from protein. This difference in
studies may be caused by the length of time the subjects were studied. There is a sharp loss of body protein the first two days
of fasting. The longer studies, like this one, may result in less protein loss and more bodyfat loss.
Another interesting point was how the fat loss affected the body. The investigators tried to determine which measurements best
reflected the loss of bodyfat - various skin-fold measurements or others. They found that measuring the circumference of the
trunk was the best indicator of body-fat loss. That should be interesting to overweight women because it means that fat loss will
be reflected in a slimmer abdomen, a desirable goal of many. But it must be pointed out that this study was on obese women and
men may respond differently. Men tend to develop fat in the abdominal area and a high percentage of it is in-side the abdominal
cavity. When worn- en develop a large abdomen, a higher portion is apt to be under the skin rather than inside the abdominal
cavity. Differences in the types of bodyfat cells involved determine the location of fat deposits.
This study does not mean that very low calorie diets are safe. Certainly we cannot recommend any such diets that are not under
careful and adequate medical supervision. Another aspect of such diets and how they affect body composition is the amount of
exercise a person does, which doesn't seem to be considered in this study. Exercise helps to prevent loss of muscle. That is why
starting a good walking program and an exercise routine that uses all the different body muscles is an important addition to a diet
that severely restricts calories. Such an exercise program can help avoid body protein loss and make the final results of any
calorie-restriction program much more successful in the long term.